Jurisdiction of the Administrative Law Court
    
	
	Click here for Jurisdiction details (Updated February 2017).
    The Court has jurisdiction over four types of matters:
    Contested
    cases.  Administrative law
    judges preside as the fact finder in contested cases involving departments of
    the executive branch of state government in which a single hearing officer, or
    an administrative law judge, is authorized or permitted by law or regulation to
    hear and decide these cases, with certain exceptions. The Courts contested 
	case jurisdiction is outlined in S.C. Code Ann.  1-23-600(B). 
  Appeals.  Administrative law judges hear all appeals
    from final decisions of contested cases heard by state agencies pursuant to the
    Administrative Procedures Act, Article I, Section 22 of the South Carolina
    Constitution, or another law, except for appeals from final decisions of the
    Public Service Commission, the State Ethics Commission, the Procurement Review
    Panel, the Workers Compensation Commission, and the Employment Security
    Commission. The Courts appellate
    jurisdiction is defined in S.C. Code Ann.  1-23-600(D).
  Regulation hearings.  Administrative law
    judges preside over public hearings held during the promulgation of regulations
    by a department of state government for which the governing authority is a
    single director.  Upon the conclusion of
    a regulation hearing, an administrative law judge issues a written report
    including findings as to the need and reasonable ness of the proposed
    regulation.  If the report includes a
    finding of a lack of need or reasonableness, the report may include suggested
    modifications to the proposed regulation. For more information concerning regulation hearings, refer to S.C. Code
    Ann.  1-23-111.
  Requests for injunctive relief. The   
    Administrative Law Court has jurisdiction to hear
    requests for injunctive or equitable relief filed by state agencies which are
    authorized by law to seek such relief. The Court may review and enforce an administrative process issued by a
    department of the executive branch of government, such as a subpoena or cease
    and desist order.  In addition, a party aggrieved by an administrative process issued by an
    executive branch agency may apply to the Court for relief from the
    process. Under the South Carolina
    Administrative Procedures Act, administrative law judges have the power to
    issue those remedial writs as are necessary to give effect to the Courts
    jurisdiction.  Further, administrative
    law judges have the same power at chambers or in open court as do circuit court
    judges, including the power of contempt.
  Appellate Review
    of ALC Decisions
  All decisions of an administrative law judge, except
    regulation hearing reports and interlocutory orders, are subject to appellate
    review.  Effective July 1, 2006, all
    appeals from decisions of administrative law judges are heard by the Court of
    Appeals, except for cases involving
    
    
    
    DHEC
    
    
    Ocean and Coastal
    Resource Management and Environmental Quality Control permits which are pending
    in the
    
    Administrative Law Court as of July
    1, 2006.  For those cases only, the DHEC Board will hear the appeals in 
  accordance with former law.  
  The Courts hearings and proceedings are open to the public
    unless confidentiality is allowed or required by law.